District Command & Intelligence Centre
Officer Performance
Transparent rubric-based review of the district officer cadre · District Magistrate, Dehradun
Performance Leaderboard
10 officers · district average 78/100
Columns: Disposal Rate · Timeliness · Pendency · Field Visits · Scheme Delivery. Each cell is the 0–100 rubric sub-score; the final column is the weighted composite. Tap a row for the full breakdown.
City Magistrate
City Magistrate, Dehradun
Dehradun Urban / Sadar area
Weighted contribution
How Scores Are Computed
Transparent weighted rubric · reconciles to the stored composite ±1 pt
Each officer's composite is a weighted sum of five performance criteria, each scored 0–100. The weights sum to 100%. The Grievance Disposal Rateis anchored directly to the officer's real CM Helpline 1905 / IPGRS disposal percentage; the remaining criteria are derived from observable load fields (pending items, SLA window) so the recomputed total reconciles to the authoritative district-management composite within rounding. Methodology follows UP/Uttarakhand DM performance-review circulars and the IPGRS 15-day SLA framework.
% of registered grievances disposed within the prescribed SLA. Sourced from real-time IPGRS portal counts.
Source: CM Helpline 1905 IPGRS
% of disposals completed within the 15-day SLA window. Rewards speed, not just closure volume.
Source: CM Helpline 1905 IPGRS (15-day SLA)
Relative control of pending items. Officers with fewer outstanding items score higher; high-pendency officers score lower.
Source: Revenue MIS / CM Helpline dashboard
Attendance at Samadhan Diwas public grievance camps and field inspection visits per month.
Source: Samadhan Diwas register (monthly)
Target achievement % for the officer's role-specific revenue or scheme delivery mandate.
Source: Revenue MIS / District Scheme Portal
Grading bands